OzGrav

  • Home
  • About
    • Vision & Mission
    • Join OzGrav
    • Mental Health and Wellbeing
    • Getting started in OzGrav
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Diversity and Inclusion
    • Code of Conduct
    • OzGrav Mentoring Program
    • Nodes & Partners
    • Facilities & Capabilities
    • Reports >
      • Annual Reports
      • Industry Success Stories
      • Strategic Plan
    • Member resources
  • Our People
    • Chief Investigators
    • Partner Investigators
    • Associate Investigators
    • Postdocs and Students >
      • Faces of OzGrav
    • Professional & Outreach staff
    • Governance Advisory Committee
    • Scientific Advisory Committee
    • Executive Committee
    • Equity & Diversity Committee
    • Early Career Researcher Committee
    • Professional Development Committee
    • Research Translation Committee
    • OzGrav Alumni
  • Research Themes
    • Instrumentation
    • Data/Astro
  • Education and Outreach
  • Events
    • OzFink workshop 2023
    • 2022 OzGrav ECR Workshop and Annual Retreat
    • Upcoming and Past Events
  • News/Media
    • News
    • Newsletter
    • How to write a research brief
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
    • Vision & Mission
    • Join OzGrav
    • Mental Health and Wellbeing
    • Getting started in OzGrav
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Diversity and Inclusion
    • Code of Conduct
    • OzGrav Mentoring Program
    • Nodes & Partners
    • Facilities & Capabilities
    • Reports >
      • Annual Reports
      • Industry Success Stories
      • Strategic Plan
    • Member resources
  • Our People
    • Chief Investigators
    • Partner Investigators
    • Associate Investigators
    • Postdocs and Students >
      • Faces of OzGrav
    • Professional & Outreach staff
    • Governance Advisory Committee
    • Scientific Advisory Committee
    • Executive Committee
    • Equity & Diversity Committee
    • Early Career Researcher Committee
    • Professional Development Committee
    • Research Translation Committee
    • OzGrav Alumni
  • Research Themes
    • Instrumentation
    • Data/Astro
  • Education and Outreach
  • Events
    • OzFink workshop 2023
    • 2022 OzGrav ECR Workshop and Annual Retreat
    • Upcoming and Past Events
  • News/Media
    • News
    • Newsletter
    • How to write a research brief
  • Contact Us

RESEARCH HIGHLIGHT: Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration

15/10/2020

0 Comments

 
​The Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (Advanced LIGO) detectors and the Virgo detector have directly observed transient gravitational waves (GWs) from compact binary coalescences. After a series of instrument upgrades to further improve the sensitivity—like replacing test masses and optics, increasing laser power, and adding squeezed light—the two LIGO detectors started the third observing run (O3), together with Virgo, on April 1st, 2019 and finished the year-long observation on Mar 27th, 2020.

The time series of dimensionless strain, defined by the differential changes in the length of the two orthogonal arms divided by the averaged full arm length (~4 km in the two LIGO detectors), is used to determine the detection of a GW signal and infer the properties of the astrophysical source. (The figure shows a conceptual diagram of the optical configuration of the Advanced LIGO interferometers.)

Due to the presence of noise and the desire to maintain the resonance condition of the optical cavities, the detectors do not directly measure the strain. The differential arm displacement is suppressed by the control force allocated to the test masses. The residual differential arm displacement in the control loop is converted into digitized photodetector output signals. Therefore, the strain is reconstructed from the raw digitized electrical output of each detector, with an accurate and precise model of the detector response to the strain. This reconstruction process is referred to as detector ‘calibration.’ The accuracy and precision of the estimated detector response, and hence the reconstructed strain data, are important for detecting GW signals and crucial for estimating their astrophysical parameters.

Understanding, accounting, and/or compensating for the complex-valued response of each part of the upgraded detectors improves the overall accuracy of the estimated detector response to GWs. Calibration systematic error is the frequency-dependent and time-dependent deviation of the estimated detector response from the true detector response. We describe our improved understanding and methods used to quantify the response of each detector, with a dedicated effort to define all places where systematic error plays a role. We use the two LIGO detectors as they stand in the first half (six months) of O3 to demonstrate how each identified systematic error impacts the reconstructed strain and constrain the statistical uncertainty therein. We report the accuracy and precision of the strain data by estimating the 68% confidence interval bounds on the systematic error and uncertainty for the response of each detector (in magnitude and phase).

In the first half of O3, the overall systematic error and uncertainty of the best calibrated data is within 7% in magnitude and 4 degrees(?) in phase in the most sensitive frequency band 20–2000 Hz. The systematic error alone, in the same band, is estimated to be below 2% in magnitude and 2 degrees in phase. Current detection of GW events and estimation of their astrophysical parameters are not yet limited by such levels of systematic error and uncertainty. However, as the global GW detector network sensitivity increases, detector calibration systematic error and uncertainty plays an increasingly important role. Limitations caused by calibration systematics on estimated GW source parameters, precision astrophysics, population studies, cosmology, and tests of general relativity are possible. Efforts are being carried out to better integrate the work presented in this paper into future GW data analyses. Research and development of new techniques are underway to further reduce calibration systematic error and uncertainty below the 1% level, a key milestone towards minimizing impacts of calibration systematics on astrophysical and cosmological results. 

​Written by Lilli Sun, OzGrav Associate Investigator, ANU
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

         


    OzGrav News


    Archives

    March 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    February 2016

    Categories

    All
    Event
    Media

      Keep up to date with ozgrav news and events

    Subscribe to Newsletter

    RSS Feed

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
We acknowledge and pay respects to the Elders and Traditional Owners of the land on which our six Australian nodes stand

​© 2022   The ARC Centre of Excellence for Gravitational  Wave Discovery (OzGrav)
Banner images: An artist's impression of gravitational waves generated by binary neutron stars.  Credits: R. Hurt/Caltech-JPL
Picture